Hi,
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:50:06AM +0800, Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> wrote:
Is there still a reason to have independent unitcheck and slowcheck
targets? They are historically different because a default module level
make would only execute the unitcheck and not the slowcheck target but if a
module level make is not executing a unitcheck anymore, slowcheck can just
be merged into unitcheck.
I think you're right, that could be simplified once the above change
goes in.
And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then be
done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?) and
would be a good rationale to rename
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)
Regards,
Rene
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.