Re: A proposal for separate English localization

Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fitoschido -AT- gmail.com>
Sun, 15 Oct 2017 05:44:27 -0500

Why is it only obvious to me that creating a separate “English locale”
(IOW, a complete copy of the source strings which would have to be kept in
sync and coherent at all times) is not sustainable?

Fix Pootle. Or let’s have Weblate.

Context

A proposal for separate English localization · Kaganski Mike
- Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
  - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Kaganski Mike
    - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Jan Iversen
      - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Toki
    - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Eike Rathke
      - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Kaganski Mike
  - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Toki
    - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Wols Lists
      - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · jonathon
        
        Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Wols Lists
        
        Re: A proposal for separate English localization · jonathon

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.