Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test

Michael Meeks <michael.meeks -AT- collabora.com>
Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:49:44 +0100


On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 12:15 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:

        would be required for the tests ? [ if it is easy to test
        then ... worse style I guess ].

Writing a XShape test only requires to create a test document that
shows the changed code. Hopefully everyone fixing a bug has created
such a document as part of the manual testing after fixing the bug. I
made it clear on this list several times that I can and will help
integrate the test but can't generate the files myself.


        Sounds problematic indeed; surely one for the ESC; I won't be there -
but no doubt Kendy can put it on the agenda.

        ATB,

                Michael. 

-- 
 michael.meeks@collabora.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Context

Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test (continued)
- Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Tomaž Vajngerl
  - Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Tomaž Vajngerl
- Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Michael Meeks
  - Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Markus Mohrhard
    - Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Michael Meeks
  - Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test · Kohei Yoshida

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.