Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Marcus,

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Markus Mohrhard
<markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hey guys,

so it is now the second time that despite me requesting a unit test in a
gerrit review request a patch has been pushed.
I only care marginally if you do it in code that I don't maintain but I will
revert it every single time when it is in code that I maintain.

I'm sorry, you are right. I shouldn't have pushed that patch before
finding a better way how to unit test that case. It was an irrational
decision I made late at night and I regret it now.

I'd appreciate a decision by the ESC to either stop this behavior or to tell
me to shut up! In the second case I will take it as another sign that the
project does not care about quality anymore.

My intention was to setup a infrastructure where we could test XShapes
more reliably by targeting only specific things in the dump which are
interested (in general way to check the whole reference dump is not
that useful as it can give false positives when something unrelated
changes).

So my intention was very much to care about the quality, however I
didn't see a reason that the patch should not be merged (or that the
burden of creating a non-trivial unit test should hold the
contribution back) but I was wrong.

Regards,
Markus

Regard, Tomaž

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.