Hi Markus,
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 18:22 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
so it is now the second time that despite me requesting a unit test in
a gerrit review request a patch has been pushed.
Sounds like bad style. Then again - how many man-hours do we expect
would be required for the tests ? [ if it is easy to test then ... worse
style I guess ].
I only care marginally if you do it in code that I don't maintain but
I will revert it every single time when it is in code that I maintain.
I wonder what the wider context is; I imagine people are fixing crazily
for -5-0-0 - and that in some cases creating a unit test consumes
significant time that will stop the next fix being got at - which will
ultimately result in a noticeably poorer quality 5.0.0 release. ie.
we're in a short-term bug-fix crunch and this is a zero sum game to some
extent.
Then again, it sounds unhelpful longer term; I wonder if we could have
the fixes on the -5-0-0 branch but not on master or on -5-0 (without a
unit test) - which would of course be pretty 'orrible as an approach:
but hopefully queue up the unit testing work to make sure that it gets
done later & yet get the fix in now.
Or perhaps that's a mad plan =)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: pushing patches despite requests for a test (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.