Hi Bjoern, Moggi,
Bjoern Michaelsen píše v Pá 24. 07. 2015 v 19:51 +0200:
On Friday, 2015-07-24 18:22:34 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
I'd appreciate a decision by the ESC to either stop this behavior or to
tell me to shut up! In the second case I will take it as another sign that
the project does not care about quality anymore.
Sorry that you feel offended by this; but please let's not overreact :-)
Of course we do care about quality, and everyone should. Education
sometimes needs time and annoying repetition..
Yes. Lets reiterate this on the ESC. Personally, I am quite in support of a
"think how to get more tests and more coverage" stance. This is indeed a
mindset question first.
In this particular case, Tomaž gave explanation why he decided to push
the patch even without the unit test, and also promised that he'll come
up with a way how to test it reliably:
"First I want this patch in.. later I'll try to find a way to reliably
test this."
I recall that Tomaž bootstrapped test infrastructure in several modules
& areas & new ways, so I trust him that he will keep the promise ;-) -
so I don't really see a problem with this approach here...
We can go through that at the ESC of course; but until then - we should
at least get a friendly message to Laurent who's the author of the
original patch, and a poor victim here :-) I'll try to ressurect the
gerrit issue entry in the meantime so that Laurent knows.
All the best,
Kendy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.