Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Kohei,

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:09:04PM -0500, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida@collabora.com> wrote:
1) To reduce the size of our shared objects.
2) To improve our build time.

1) is apparently important for Michael Stahl, and I personally care
about 2) since it directly affects my development efficiency.

My belief was that this was not a controvercial change, but it appears
that it is.  If there is a strong objection I'll stop doing it.  If not,
I'd like to continue pursing this since it seems to improve both of the
2 aforementioned points, and I've only covered perhaps 10-20% of all
possible candidates.

Please share your opinions.

I very much appreciate the work you do here, if regular developers
ignore the build time issues with buying faster and faster HW, then at
some point we won't be able to attract new contributors.

I know that some feel this makes debugging harder, as printing the
object will now show only a pImpl pointer and not the data members, but
then gdb can call method calls just fine, so calling the relevant
members isn't that hard, IMHO. (Or if it's a frequently used object, a
pretty-printer can be added.)

Thanks,

Miklos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.