Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


It has come to my attention that some folks are feeling a bit uneasy
about my recent pimplization of some of what I call "high impact" public
classes.  I just wanted to make it clear that the reason I'm doing this
is in direct reponse to the discussion we recently had during our ESC
call wrt the bloated object sizes of our shared objects, most notably
those generated from sc and sw modules.

There are 2 main reasons I'm doing this.

1) To reduce the size of our shared objects.
2) To improve our build time.

1) is apparently important for Michael Stahl, and I personally care
about 2) since it directly affects my development efficiency.

My belief was that this was not a controvercial change, but it appears
that it is.  If there is a strong objection I'll stop doing it.  If not,
I'd like to continue pursing this since it seems to improve both of the
2 aforementioned points, and I've only covered perhaps 10-20% of all
possible candidates.

Please share your opinions.

Kohei


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.