On 12/11/2014 03:09 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Please share your opinions.
I think, as always, the pros and cons have to be weighed.
The benefit is decoupling. It apparently has a positive impact on the
size of debug information put into link objects by today's toolchains.
(And I would be surprised if it had an impact on any non-debug parts of
link objects.) Another positive impact is improved build time with
today's toolchains (sans pch). (But remember that pimpl-ization will
always need to include <memory> into the include file, so don't go
overboard with erasing standard library includes from include files.)
Disadvantages that come to mind are increased usage of dynamic memory
(which can impact both space and time), and, to some extend at least,
increased complexity of the code "in the small" (although complexity "in
the large" is probably reduced by the decoupling).
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.