On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:16:45PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:55:05AM +0100, Noel Power wrote:
In the binary case the possibilities should be clear. But even if
Libreoffice didn't ship any basic libraries as part of the core it
wouldn't change the fact that enterprises normally deploy all of
their macros in share, I doubt they would wish that a user could
'override' any libraries (including Access2Base that possibly some
of their macros have a dependency on)
Enterprises are free, if they so wish, to forbid their employees to
install an extension that overrides a part of core, or otherwise
override a part of LibreOffice core.
FWIIW, an enterprise could also wish to deploy a newer Access2Base
version without upgrading to LibreOffice Fresh (because they are
enterprise, they want Stable), because it suits their newly developed
macros better... And then doing it by a system-wide extension is much
better than having to recompile the whole of LibreOffice.
--
Lionel
Context
- Re: Access2Base - New release (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.