On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:18:51AM +0200, Jean-Pierre Ledure wrote:
On 13/05/2014 10:13, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I presume it is compliant with the LO release policy to push the same
patch also to the LO 4.2 branch ?
I don't think so; no new features, only bugfixes.
Can't an "installation as extension" override the bundled one, or
something like that?
I don't see how: installing the extension on LO 4.2 makes that 2
Basic libraries with the same name are present either in "My macros"
or in "LibreOffice macros".
To be used a library must first be loaded by giving its (presumably
unique) name ??
Yes, but one might hope that when loading the library, one source is
always preferred over the other. With some luck, "My Macros & Dialogs"
will always be preferred to "LibreOffice Macros & Dialogs". But maybe
we are unlucky and it is other way round. (I think in general both
ways make sense, as long as the choice is made consistently; some
scenarios favour "priority to My Macros", other scenarios favour
"priority to LibreOffice". By "luck" I mean "LibreOffice Basic was
designed with the choice that suits our current scenario".)
The result is LO being unstable or corrupt.
As in you tried and bad things happen?
--
Lionel
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.