On 01/08/12 09:01, Philipp Riemer wrote:
Hi Noel,
to my eyes the diffs are below the text description in the ".txt"
file. Correct me if I am wrong but with all comment lines starting
with "#" it should be a valid patch file even if the file extension is
".txt" and not ".patch", or not? However, I did not try to apply it
since I have no source clone here.
Or did I understand something wrong in your comment above?
I'm not disputing the validity of the patch format, but... Johann has
created a patch that contains a large portion of existing patches that I
already created ( that already either exist on master and/or in the mail
thread referenced ) with I believe additional tweaks from himself. However
since that patch is effectively a squash of his and my work it is rather
difficult to see what changes he made exactly. A patch consisting solely of
his changes against the source ( patched already with my patches ) would be
much easier for me to read
Noel
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.