Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 01/08/12 09:01, Philipp Riemer wrote:
Hi Noel,
to my eyes the diffs are below the text description in the ".txt"
file. Correct me if I am wrong but with all comment lines starting
with "#" it should be a valid patch file even if the file extension is
".txt" and not ".patch", or not? However, I did not try to apply it
since I have no source clone here.

Or did I understand something wrong in your comment above?

I'm not disputing the validity of the patch format, but... Johann has created a patch that contains a large portion of existing patches that I already created ( that already either exist on master and/or in the mail thread referenced ) with I believe additional tweaks from himself. However since that patch is effectively a squash of his and my work it is rather difficult to see what changes he made exactly. A patch consisting solely of his changes against the source ( patched already with my patches ) would be much easier for me to read

Noel

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.