Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
> yeah that would be fine indeed, but it's unfortunately a complete PITA
> to build the pre-3.5 stuff because some genius had the glorious idea to
> split the code across 20 git repositories, so good luck trying to find a
> combination of revisions from all these that actually builds successfully.

Ah, thanks for the heads-up. That does sound like a big undertaking.
My first thought was to just do a little digging and see what builds
we already have sitting around on various servers -- that might give
us enough coverage for the regressions that fall between the creation
of LO and 3.5.