On 27/07/12 19:15, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:
Hi Robinson, Hi Norbert,
can anyone of you join the QA Call:
to report about the tinbuild/bibisect progress?
Hi Bjoern,
Sorry I wasn't able to make the QA call.
One thought that came to me yesterday re: unified bibisect repository
is that it would be great to have some older builds from 3.4 and
before in there. I think it's fine if the older point releases don't
have as fine a resolution as 3.5 and 3.6, but it would be great to
have at least enough builds to pinpoint in which LO point release the
bug appeared (or if a bug predates the creation of LO altogether).
yeah that would be fine indeed, but it's unfortunately a complete PITA
to build the pre-3.5 stuff because some genius had the glorious idea to
split the code across 20 git repositories, so good luck trying to find a
combination of revisions from all these that actually builds successfully.
Context
- Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 (continued)
Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 · Bjoern Michaelsen
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.