Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2

Robinson Tryon <bishop.robinson -AT- gmail.com>
Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:15:37 -0400

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:

Hi Robinson, Hi Norbert,
can anyone of you join the QA Call:
to report about the tinbuild/bibisect progress?


Hi Bjoern,
Sorry I wasn't able to make the QA call.

One thought that came to me yesterday re: unified bibisect repository
is that it would be great to have some older builds from 3.4 and
before in there. I think it's fine if the older point releases don't
have as fine a resolution as 3.5 and 3.6, but it would be great to
have at least enough builds to pinpoint in which LO point release the
bug appeared (or if a bug predates the creation of LO altogether).

--R

Context

Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 (continued)
- Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 · Bjoern Michaelsen
  - Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 · Robinson Tryon
    - Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 · Michael Stahl
      - Re: Adding bibisect repository support to tinbuild2 · Robinson Tryon

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.