Lubos Lunak wrote:
Hmm. That makes it something we should take into consideration then, but that consideration may be quickly over with saying that it's internal API and as such we don't care about people who abuse it.
There's more nuance required here I think. Substantial use of "unstable" API still leaves us with noticeable repercussions on the extension ecosystem, that we might want to have *once*, and not spread over multiple releases. Cheers, -- Thorsten
Attachment:
pgp48HNA1pa4O.pgp
Description: PGP signature