On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
When you apply a series in sequence, at any point the result must be
buildable...
1/ it is good practice
2/ if that is not the case bisection is much harder
... but it has a lower importance than having the tip of master buildable all
the time. Which is why a tinderbox should leave testing intermediate states
aside as long as there are still things to test that ensure the tip of master
to stay buildable.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
- Re: probabilistic approach to tinderboxing (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.