Re: probabilistic approach to tinderboxing

On 06/13/2012 03:00 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
> <bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com>  wrote:
> > Well, I simplified a bit here. When using gerrit you would push one patch
> > separate if it is independant and multiple patches as a series if they are
> > dependant. gerrit handles that correctly as a 'patch series'. I would not want
> > to testbuild in the middle of one such series of patches
>
> Well... it _should_ be buildable at each step of the patch series...

I think you are confusing buildability after each patch of a series has 
been applied in sequence (which is a desirable property indeed) vs. 
buildability with each patch of a series applied individually ("out of 
context," what Eike's concern was).

Stephan