Norbert Thiebaud wrote (27 februari 2012 08:26)
With hindsight it would probably have been better to make a constant for
this colour. It is not good practice to leave such colour definitions in
the code.
yes, my point exactly :-)
It is not too late to do the 'Right Thing'(tm) including in master.
Have made proper code, am testing now and will submit when ok (may take a
day or so beacuse of other running modifications).
I hope my explanations will help you. I not, please say so.
...
In order for _me_ to sign-off for 3.5 branch, I would need you to
break your patch along the lines discussed earlier...
But hey, maybe someone else will review and sign-off as is...
If you can't reformat with diff + sed magic, I certainly can't. I am quite
bad at magic tricks :-)
I'll wait for a proper diff/sed magician to announce him/herself, or as you
say, maybe someone else will review and sign-off as is.
Anyway, your comment will make my future contributions better; thank you.
Winfried
Context
- Re: [REVIEW] [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation (continued)
RE: [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation · Winfried Donkers
Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation · Norbert Thiebaud
Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document creation · Olivier Hallot
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.