Norbert Thiebaud wrote (27 februari 2012 08:26)
With hindsight it would probably have been better to make a constant for
this colour. It is not good practice to leave such colour definitions in
the code.
yes, my point exactly :-)
It is not too late to do the 'Right Thing'(tm) including in master.
Have made proper code, am testing now and will submit when ok (may take a 
day or so beacuse of other running modifications).
I hope my explanations will help you. I not, please say so.
...
In order for _me_ to sign-off for 3.5 branch, I would need you to
break your patch along the lines discussed earlier...
But hey, maybe someone else will review and sign-off as is...
If you can't reformat with diff + sed magic, I certainly can't. I am quite
bad at magic tricks :-)
I'll wait for a proper diff/sed magician to announce him/herself, or as you 
say, maybe someone else will review and sign-off as is.
Anyway, your comment will make my future contributions better; thank you.
Winfried
Context
- Re: [REVIEW] [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card	document creation (continued)
 
  RE: [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card	document creation · Winfried Donkers
  Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document	creation · Norbert Thiebaud
  Re: [PATCH]bug 44516 improved label and business card document	creation · Olivier Hallot
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.