Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers?

Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michaelsen -AT- canonical.com>
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:30:38 +0100

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:14:03AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:

      I guess we'd want to encourage someone to take over from August on the
include-what-you-use front, but - that seems to suggest adding more
includes to compiling code so ... ;-)


... and then the next step is to slice-and-dice god-objects like SwDoc in small
little one object, one job parts so that some part of code concerning page
layout doesnt have to care about how fields are maanged (and reparse all
includes from that without ever using them). That can be done with one
responsibility at a time. Incedentally, that will also improve code readability.

Best,

Bjoern

Context

Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? (continued)
- Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? · Eike Rathke

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.