On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Could not the windows build be helped by having only one location for include
files where a script would at the beginning of the build create for each .hxx
file a small wrapper with the same name only doing #include of the real one,
with the right path to it?
An _additional_ file to open? I highly doubt it will increase windows
performance. I would assume the opposite, but of course, I am open to hard
facts.
And, since I'm already asking, is the Windows performance the reason include
files are scattered this way? E.g. in sw/ I find this actually rather
annoying, some .hxx files are in inc/, some next to .cxx sources, Writer
AFAIK does not really export anything anyway, and I always have to jump
around just to find the right header file :(.
No its just historic mess. Never attribute to malice ...
Best,
Bjoern
Context
- Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? (continued)
Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? · Bjoern Michaelsen
Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? · Norbert Thiebaud
Re: Has the time come to get rid of the "delivering" of public headers? · Eike Rathke
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.