Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 01:22 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
It is neither an anachronism or has something to do with building over the
network. Nobody sane did that on Windows anyway

        Surely that is what Hamburg release engineering did for years :-)

But for things like sw or sc, the lack of encapsulation and the need to include
75% of all the public headers in each and every compile (e.g. via
sw/inc/doc.hxx) and reparse those are a real killer.

        Ok - so, at least some better data. But this seems to suggest that the
problem is not multiple include-path sub-directories (as was suggested)
but badly structured includes - which is an orthogonal problem - right ?

        At least, I share Tor's view that we should have some real numbers
about the cost of a given thing: multiple include paths, vs. single ones
before doing the re-licensing & then the code re-structuring ;-)

        ATB,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.