Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 21/02/12 11:59, Michael Meeks wrote:
would need to try that out on Windows, but my guess is that even if it
doesn't blow out command line length limits (which could be worked
around with a response file) it'll make the Windows build a lot slower
because compiler has to try out all include paths (well statistically
half of them but that is bad enough) for every included files, and those
file accesses take forever on Windows.

^^ This!

IIRC, Mathias Bauer benchmarked that once and noted that on Windows each added
path has a significant impact on buildtime, so you really dont what to go
laissez-faire with those. Also the order of -I-switches can be quite important.

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.