On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:57:58 +0100
Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:58 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow wrote:
I would not like to see a new configure flag for doxygen, the odk flag suffices;
generate the documentation anyway. Otherwise it is always good to use standards.
Do you mean, those who do not have doxygen and don't want to or can't
install it should use --disable-odk (i.e., do not build SDK at all)
instead of --without-doxygen (i.e., build SDK but without C++
documentation)?
Doxygen won't be shipped with LO source like all the other 3rd parties?! Interesting ...
And what do you mean with "generate the documentation anyway"?
If doxygen is there, you can use it anyway.
If the generation has to be configurable, chain it to --with-help or
--with-helppack-integration or so?!
I'd say these are rather unrelated, so would prefer not to combine them.
One kind of help for a developer is what doxygen generates I would say.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.