Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:01:05AM +0000, Pedro Lino wrote:

"> at best redundant with the git-sha...

Redundant is good!


And "at best redundant" is _not_ good. Esp. if it can be misunderstood by
nontechnical users.


and that is still only half of the problem: I still fail to see how a
'non-technical' user is going to get a date/timestamp associated with
a given 'fix', unless he also has a git sha1 at which point the whole
timestamp mess is moot (since you have then the two sha1 needed to get
a definitive answer).

Norbert

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.