Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On 2 December 2011 13:06, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@suse.com> wrote:
Hi Astron,

On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:15 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
Ohhhh, you removed all the "JP: XX.XX.199X" markers, which were always a
warning to me to step very carefully as it meant "there be dragons" to me ;)

Uhm, okay. Should we, as in: I, add them back in? Or should they be
translated as "here be dragons" (or alternatively: "here be JOEs"

       Lol :-) I think Bjoern is just joking - we're well rid of that mess.
We'll soon re-discover the fragile bits of code after we change them in
future ;->

Well I thought so already. Maybe we indeed should add a marker saying
exactly that?

But then, what constitutes an old comment? Very often I found that the
"JP with a date" comments were obviously added _after_ the original
comment.

Maybe a "FIXME: Old comment" would be a good heads-up?

Also, the comments are literally littered with "!!!!!ACHTUNG: !!!!!"
and double question marks. What should we make of that?

Lots of questions :).

Cheers and have a fine weekend,
Philipp

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.