Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 00:08 +0100, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
       Lol :-) I think Bjoern is just joking - we're well rid of that mess.
We'll soon re-discover the fragile bits of code after we change them in
future ;->

Well I thought so already. Maybe we indeed should add a marker saying
exactly that?

        Nah - we should expunge all superstitious comments & as/when people
change fragile code & create bugs, hopefully they will re-write it, if
not - they'll create a bug, and the bug fixer (while getting ill reading
it) will hopefully re-write it :-)

But then, what constitutes an old comment? Very often I found that the
"JP with a date" comments were obviously added _after_ the original
comment.

        Really - trying to detect and annotate fragile pieces of code with
special comments is not a winning idea I think :-) so just carry on
removing junk 'JP 12345' comments without any concern ...

        All the best,

                Michael

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.