Hi Eike,
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Eike Rathke <ooo@erack.de> wrote:
But based on what I'm seeing on this thread, I take that the new glyph
metric calculation algorithm is the correct way? If so, then we'll have
to make some adjustments to some of the size sensitive areas to bring
things back to the way they were prior to the change. One place I
definitely have to adjust is the default row height, which is now
noticeably smaller.
Yes, that would indeed be needed. Probably also import/export from/to
Excel needs new row-height calculation, as they specify row height in
fractions of font height, IIRC.
Well, for the import of Excel binary documents, this won't be an
issue. We use the actual absolute row height values stored in the
Excel document and doesn't re-calculate heights based on the content
upon import.
I'm not sure about the export, but I'm pretty sure it's fixable even
if it's an issue.
Kohei
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing · Eike Rathke
Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing · Kohei Yoshida
Re: [Libreoffice] Bringing some sanity to interline spacing · Eike Rathke
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.