Re: [Libreoffice] consistent namespaces & future breakage ...

Lubos Lunak <l.lunak -AT- suse.cz>
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:08:51 +0200

On Wednesday 20 of April 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:

      And of course, we should extend the above list to cover all our pet
hates that we can't currently fix IMHO.


 I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread 
grow into a monster, but could it be said more specifically what we cannot 
fix currently? As I understand it we cannot break backwards compatibility 
only for things related to extensions (UNO, what else?), but even there I'm 
not sure what that all means code-wise.

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak@suse.cz

Context

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.