Hi Lubos,
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 17:08 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
I don't want to comment on the specific items as that could make this thread
grow into a monster, but could it be said more specifically what we cannot
fix currently ?
:-) from 10k feet anything in clone/ure/ is the public ABI/API.
That includes some monumental performance blunders - such as the
'store' code, and the IDL interfaces (in theory only the ones marked
'published' in the IDL).
As I understand it we cannot break backwards compatibility
only for things related to extensions (UNO, what else?),
but even there I'm not sure what that all means code-wise.
Just UNO; and of course key behaviours of the actual UNO interfaces
themselves - as implemented all over the place ;-)
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.