Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:59 PM, plino <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:

Jesús, thank you for the new build. Unfortunately it doesn't fix the problem.
Even if it did, the next time a user installs an OOo update wouldn't the
problem appear again? If you add your fix to LO only, OOo updates won't
unfix it?

Yes, that's my primary purpose: that other updates don't unfix it.
Installing the build and then OOo 3.3 works fine for me.

We are going into the right direction, but it seems it's not ready
yet. What scenario are you testing?


I can't see any other permanent solution than renaming the exes...

Unfortunately this will only fixes part of the problem. And also it's
different to rename the exes when the program is already installed
than installing the exes with different names. And an update will
unfix everything.

BTW I have NEVER said it's a minor change. I'm just saying that it's better
to do this change sooner than later.

And my only argument for changing this now is that I think the first
impression is really important.  If the first release is successful most
people will stick with LO from the beginning.

I agree with that.

I will post another build today night or tomorrow.

-- 
Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org>
Document Foundation founding member
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.