Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



Michael, please don't regard this as a personal complaint.

I think many users who are currently using OOo will have this problem when
they try LO (and update any of them).

I think it's a bad idea to cause grievance to users who are giving it a go.
IMO it will make them stick to OOo...

Changing this now would be a wiser option. 

As I mentioned in a previous post, I can manually change the exe names to
l*.exe (as long as I don't rename soffice.exe which must be fixed
internally) without any loss in functionality. I think this proves that it's
a minor change for the program but a major change for usability.

Just my 2 cents.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Change-executable-sh-names-tp2108193p2255023.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.