Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, plino <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:

Michael, please don't regard this as a personal complaint.

I think many users who are currently using OOo will have this problem when
they try LO (and update any of them).

I think it's a bad idea to cause grievance to users who are giving it a go.
IMO it will make them stick to OOo...

Changing this now would be a wiser option.

As I mentioned in a previous post, I can manually change the exe names to
l*.exe (as long as I don't rename soffice.exe which must be fixed
internally) without any loss in functionality. I think this proves that it's
a minor change for the program but a major change for usability.

Just my 2 cents.

No, it's not a minor change as there are also many changes in the
registry to be done.

And also it doesn't fix the problem that when you uninstall OOo, the
current LibO installation gets broken, which in my opinion is a lot
more serious than the file association.

-- 
Jesús Corrius <jesus@softcatala.org>
Document Foundation founding member
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.