Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Miklos, Thorsten,

On 2010-12-03 at 13:11 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:

I find it surprising me actually saying this, but - for the while, I
think this would be crossing the line of solving a social problem
by technical means. ;)

Additionally I'm not aware of a method to tell doxygen to check just a
part of a file. And issuing a warning about 'class Foo is not
documented' just because someone touched class Bar in the same file is
indeed incorrect. ;)

That's why I highlighted that this would be done only with _new_ files,
ie. the files that have have been git add'ed, and did not exist in the
repository before.  And we can further limit that only to .hxx/.h.

As to the crossing the line - the first time it won't let you commit,
and you'll be angry, the second time it won't let you commit, and you'll
just fix that, and the third time you'll comment just naturally, and
won't even hit the check :-)  This worked with the warnings about how to
structure the git commit logs [do you ever hit the hook that the 2nd
line in the commit log should be empty?], so I don't see why it
shouldn't work in this case ;-)

Regards,
Kendy


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.