Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes

Miklos Vajna <vmiklos -AT- frugalware.org>
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:34:28 +0100

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@novell.com> wrote:

My rationale: Many times when I work on feature branches, I commit stuff
but intentionally not provide documentation because the role of the
class/method/whatever may change during the course of the
implementation.  This requirement would break my workflow, and I
wouldn't appreciate that.

Encouraging good documentation is a must, but making it a requirement
even for new files unconditionally is bad.


Hm, what about enforcing it only in master / libreoffice-* branches?
(Just an idea.)

Attachment: pgpTO9zZM9Pje.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Context

Re: [Libreoffice] Script to find undocumented classes (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.