On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 05:12 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
I thinking of cutting my fingers off, I seem to be completely unable to
reliably press 'Reply-to-all'
email message attachment
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Noel Power <nopower@novell.com>
To: caolanm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] cppcheck warning in
sw/source/ui/uiview/viewprt.cxx
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:59:04 -0600
Hi Caolan
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:31 +0100, Caoln McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 03:24 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
Anybody have any idea or thoughts about that ?
Take the OSL_* family as the canonical ones, and typically replace the
others when them.
You mean to remove all those DBG_XXXX ones and all the fancy logging,
filtering support etc. or just the ASSERT(s)
I'd be tempted to just have the OSL_* family and remove the DBG_* ones,
and convert the writer specific ASSERT, etc. things to OSL_*
as well.
Does anyone use that
dbgutil stuff? ( /me recall that maybe there is some extra usage ( or is
it just annoyance ) using that with windows )
I know that *I* never use it :-)
Remove vos in total.
sure but that part of a different task, although replacing any instance
of VOS_ASSERT would be a start ( confusion reduction )
yeah, sure.
As an aside, I think dtardon was poking at the output from --with-debug
builds and filing some patches as he was going along.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.