Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index

-------- Original Message  --------
From: Heiko Tietze
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:43:32 +0100

Hi all,

we repeatedly talk about sidebars, whether it should be resizable with
or without constraints, how to make it configurable, what features to
add, and so on. Often we run into a fundamental discussion, which is
an indicator for a missing concept. So the idea is to ask the users
how they utilize the sidebar and how they want it to evolve.

The proposal for this survey is available on GDoc

and for the FLOSS enthusiasts also on LibO pads

Please take a look for completeness and if the intro text makes sense.
If there are no objections I suggest to make the decision for the post
on Friday (and start the survey this weekend).


Hi Heiko,

Nice proposal. Here are a couple of trivial grammar suggestions:

* If I understand the intention of the sentence correctly, "Simplified
spoken..." should say "In simplified terms..."

* Likewise " meet the concept strictly." should say " strictly
meet the concept."

Also, I don't understand why the first question only makes reference to
Writer & Calc. IMNSHO the survey should cover all modules where the
sidebar <rant>regression,</rant> is imposed.

For those of us that loath and detest the IBM sidebar, only marginally
less than the MSO ribbon, please add one more option, OR replace the
existing "( ) No, I tried it but prefer toolbars." option, in the first
question with:
( ) Yes, Only because I am forced to use it.

I propose this because it might give a clearer assessment of why the
options in the other questions were chosen.

Just my 2ยข worth.


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.