This is a great idea. One of the biggest factors in the success in free
software projects is clear leadership. Design especially requires a cohesive
vision and direction in order to be successful, so actually creating
positions for this is essential.
Several people have noted that LibreOffice design has few volunteers, which
ironically is exactly why creating these positions is so important. Design
leadership attracts talent. These leads could put forward and enforce an
overall vision for LibreOffice and make it easier for new contributors to
get involved.
If you look at the projects that produce good design, like GNOME and
elementary, a common attribute is having people who are competent and
opinionated about design who can put forward a singular vision that defines
all of the work. KDE seems to be adopting a modified version of this
approach with their visual design group, and the results look promising,
except that their approach is more centered on community involvement, which
I think is the direction LibreOffice needs to go.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Team-organization-tp4112893p4114058.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.