Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Daniel,

Your mockup looks okay, but I'm a little confused. You say that duplicate
controls are bad, but you included duplicate direct formatting controls in
your bottom toolbar. For me, the whole point is to shift controls to the
sidebar, and avoid toolbars. I don't think there's any problem with
duplicate controls, so long as it's clear they do the same thing.

I don't think it would be unreasonable to have a default sidebar, but make
it customizable so that those who wish to can put their own controls where
they want them. Far better than trying to divine the correct placement of
single controls would be to allow users to create the interface they're
comfortable with; the tools I use most often won't be the ones you choose.
Most software seems to have headed this way in recent years, and it's a good
thing.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Sidebar-Problem-tp4094331p4106167.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.