Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 06/12/2013 19:39, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hello Michel,


Indeed. I find you quite shy in fact, and I'm serious. To me it does
not look like you were ignored, rather that no one knows about it.
Which is a problem since the start.

I wouldn't say I'm shy, I'm just polite and I don't want to waste time and energy in endless discussion (mail or chat). And I understood that in this mailing list, you have to insist or even be aggressive to explain/force your UX ideas while I expected professional skills and democracy, at least meritocracy (I really miss Christoph Noack).


What would be better is that if your proposals were communicated. I've
never seen your name, never read any of your mails (except this thread)

False !
I wrote articles in my blog about LibreOffice design process in march/april 2013 and on 11/04/2013 sent an email : To:,

So, you had at least one (important !) email from me.

And I had only 2 answers :
- one from Emir Yâsin SARI
- the other from Michael Meeks :
    (short version with my words)
    - "we don't want to take care of your advises"
    - "TDF is very happy with the current design team"

and also few comments directly in the blog, but nobody from the TDF.
So, when someone as Michael Meeks closes the door to my suggestions, what can I expect ? I would be foolish to insist.

So I can return your argument :
why only 2 person wrote answers to my articles in this ml ?
why didn't you realized at that time that I have some expertise in UX design ? why nothing has changed in the design team workflow ? and in the way devs and designers work together ?

Ans same question for my suggestion to postpone the startcenter : you ask my reasons to do so, but I explained it in my mail, just read it !

I don't read everything on the design list, but  I believe that
if you have not engaged with the design team first, nothing will happen.

Just FYI, I started with project OOo Renaissance ! (May 2009)

My complete proposal as a pdf file (37 pages, 630 Ko)
(it was far from being perfect because I created it in few nights, while working for a diploma ; but still interesting ideas)

BTW, you can see that there was already the "dribbblization" problem : only proposals made with screenshots had strong reviews.

and I'm listed in the initial members of LO design team (but this page has been archived) :

BTW, Mirek, there is no information about you.
What is your *real* experience in software design ?
Have you ever produced a professional software ?

For my emails, just look at archive of mailing list and chat logs : I worked for color picker, template manager. From my email client stats, I wrote 77 mails in design list and 52 in ux-advise. I agree, I didn't communicated on a regular basis : I'm just a volunteer and also have a daily job. But when I realized that current design team lacks basic UX skills (while working on color picker), I lost most of my motivation and felt it was useless to make proposals.

And the last emails in this mailing list really broke the last bits of motivation :
- saying officially that design is and will ever be a second class citizen
- saying officially that TDF will never listen to users
- saying officially that nothing will change (no roadmap, no mid/long term vision, only "bazaar" short term changes) beacuse LO is, as Charles said, a libertarian project
- design team has no plans to enhance the design process

So I have nothing more to do for LibreOffice.
So this is my last message before unsubscribe.


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.