Re: Fwd: [libreoffice-design] Re: A new old branding?

Hi Klaus,

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:23 PM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol <
ol@sophia-louise.de> wrote:

> Hi Mirek, all,
> Am 16.01.2013 20:26, schrieb Mirek M.:
>
>  On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Pedro <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  mirek2 wrote
> > > > This time, it seems that, again, mostly splashes have been proposed, so
> > > > it's likely that additional effort required. That means that,
> > > > ultimately,
> > > > the decision should rest with the people who can be counted on to do
> > > > that
> > > > work on time and in shippable quality. Those tend to be the regular IRC
> > > > chat attendees, though if they don't attend, they'll be e-mailed.
> > > > They'll
> > > > also be responsible for getting a license statement and having the new
> > > > branding included in LibreOffice.
> > >
> > > It should have been specified in the Summary that a full set was required
> > > :)
> > It's not required, but it is a factor in our decisions. That's why it's
> > listed under "Scope".
>
> Should we put a persona to "scope" too? Because it is a new feature for
> 4.0 and we should show the new branding with a persona.


LibreOffice prides itself on feeling native on a variety of platforms, and
it'd be good to keep it that way. The personas are just for people who
aren't satisfied with the default look.
With Firefox, it's the same thing. The default look is meant to resemble a
native application, while personas have a niche audience.

So, speaking for myself, I'd say no. But I'll raise the subject on the IRC
chat.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted