Hi Andreas, all,
as promised, a mockup;
http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/File:**PROP_ExtensionsSite_111022NS.*
*jpg<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:PROP_ExtensionsSite_111022NS.jpg>
I've kept it realistic and in-line with the current site format/contents so
that it would be easier to implement.
The search box could always be moved back outside the Navbar if it causes
hassles to implement.
I envisage that the "only in current section" and other search options
(categories) would pop up upon clicking the "plus" alongside the search
field. Similarly, the full list of languages be made visible upon clicking
the down-arrow next to the current language.
I have more adventurous ideas, but they can wait.
That gets the ball rolling. Let me know what you think.
-Nik
On 11.10.22 01:12, Nik wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On 11.10.08 05:24, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi all,
the new extensions-site is in a test-mode since some weeks now. We have
already
worked on a header graphic for the site. This is online now. But maybe
there are some
ideas for improvements of the sites layout. I hope to get some proposals
/ mockups
from the "design-experts" here ;-)
You can find the site here at the moment:
http://extensions-test.**libreoffice.org<http://extensions-test.libreoffice.org>
Regards,
Andreas
I'd be happy to chip in a mock-up soon, but could you do me one favour in
advance;
(I'm sorry to sound like a stubborn and difficult Designer, even though I
am, but ...)
could you reinstate the original extensions logo?
...this one: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/cgi_**
img_auth.php/7/7e/**ExtensionsLogo_110712NS.png<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/7/7e/ExtensionsLogo_110712NS.png>
I realise you modified the placement, size (and indeed the very shape) of
the triangles to attract /attention/, and you've succeeded: but for some
wrong reasons...
The triangles are attracting "bad" attention because they are mis-aligned
with the text (vertically).
This is the same as when you see one street-pole bent and the others are
intact. It isn't desirable.
And the ability to discern the "X" created by the negative space between
the triangles is lost when you remove the "X" from the context in which it
would usually occur (i.e. at the same hieght as the neighbouring letters).
Believe me, the colour-contrast will be sufficent in attracting attention,
the size-difference right now is unnerving.
And the inconsistencies in shape look unprofessional.
Also, the sharp corners of the new triangles conflict with the soft
corners of the document symbol nearby.
And the radial gradient now employed doesn't suggest modularity like the
broken conical gradient did.
I'm being nit-picky. I'm sorry. I'll be quiet now.
-Nik
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
design+help@global.**libreoffice.org<design%2Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
List archive:
http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/design/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/>
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.