Björn Balazs wrote:
The first step would be to actually start talking to users. This is what I
try to intend right now. This should be purely voluntary, un-obstrusive
and
will for sure be biased in the one or the other way. But it is also done
without great effort from our side.
This way we can gain experiences with talking to our users.
In the course of these surveys we can then (user-centrically) evaluate the
acceptance of other ways of involving users into the development.
Dear Bjorn,
What you are suggesting calls for methods like an open or semi-structured
interview (rather than a closed questionnaire).
I agree that this is, indeed, a good way to get an initial feel-n-touch of
the "field".
But do you have in mind a way to do it virtually or do you?
Best,
dror
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/User-Research-tp3067418p3072811.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-design] User Research (continued)
Re: Re: [libreoffice-design] User Research · Christoph Noack
Re: [libreoffice-design] User Research · planas
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.