Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Nik, all,

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Nik <> wrote:
I hope this gets interpreted as helpful feedback and not b!tching/lecturing.
I'm just genuinely concerned about what we put out for the public to see.
And a lot of people might see these.
Sorry if I came across rude; no sleep.
And sorry Ron, I'm not having a go at you, it's just a touchy matter?

+1 to your whole email. I hate to say this, but I could create that
saturated gel effect in Photoshop in 10 seconds (IIRC, it's one of the
default presets available for instant use); using such 'stock' effects
for banners would speak ill of LibreOffice's quality; we need
something more sophisticated if we are to be credible.

The same (+1) goes for Bernhard's point about interpreting apparent
lack of replies. I was going to reply to this email, but I realized
that in order for my reply to be constructive, it would necessarily
have to be long to explain things sufficiently and I just didn't have
the time.

Thank you both for raising these points so clearly, and I hope we can
all work together to iterate the banner design to something we can all
be proud of.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.