Bonsoir,
Le 26/04/2016 08:01, mjollnir66@laposte.net a écrit :
Dans cet article qui a fait référence sur la toile :
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/case/complex-singularity-versus-openness
il est fait allusion à, non pas deux, mais trois formats OOXML.
Je cite :
"There is the ECMA version (that’s the one MS Office 2007 writes, which was certified by ECMA
International). Then there is OOXML Transitional, which is relatively close to the ECMA version, and is the
format that all later versions to date write as default. Finally, there is OOXML Strict."
pour info, une version en français est là :
http://www.numericoach.net/?Incompatibilites-et-incoherences-du
Bien cordialement,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
--
Envoyez un mail à discuss+unsubscribe@fr.libreoffice.org pour savoir comment vous désinscrire
Les archives de la liste sont disponibles à http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/fr/discuss/
Tous les messages envoyés sur cette liste seront archivés publiquement et ne pourront pas être
supprimés
Context
- Re: [fr-discuss] RGI 2.0 (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.