Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


On 12/15/2011 04:11 AM, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
H-Online has published[1] such article, what do you think about?

[1] 
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/European-IT-authorities-want-better-OOXML-in-Libre-OpenOffice-1395595.html

In the third paragraph:
The Open Source Business Alliance has created a new working group – "Office Interoperability" – to manage the project

I would like for "interoperability" (the ability to; take an ooxml, edit it in LibO and then hand it back to an MSO user) to be stronger. This is because we want to use LibO but, in our experience, after we return an ooxml doc (MSO v2010) to our partners, they complain either about formating or, sometimes, even the inability to open the doc again in MSO.

The article references a slide presentation by Mattias Sturmer <http://goo.gl/mPZaC>. It's worth scanning. Slides 6 and 7 make a lot of sense to me.

hth,
-Craig

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@us.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/us/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.