On 12/15/2011 04:11 AM, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
H-Online has published[1] such article, what do you think about?
[1]
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/European-IT-authorities-want-better-OOXML-in-Libre-OpenOffice-1395595.html
In the third paragraph:
The Open Source Business Alliance has created a new working group –
"Office Interoperability" – to manage the project
I would like for "interoperability" (the ability to; take an ooxml, edit
it in LibO and then hand it back to an MSO user) to be stronger. This is
because we want to use LibO but, in our experience, after we return an
ooxml doc (MSO v2010) to our partners, they complain either about
formating or, sometimes, even the inability to open the doc again in MSO.
The article references a slide presentation by Mattias Sturmer
<http://goo.gl/mPZaC>. It's worth scanning. Slides 6 and 7 make a lot of
sense to me.
hth,
-Craig
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@us.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/us/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.