On 2013-04-10 10:19, Dave Johnson wrote:
I've never heard of "International-EN", but I'll go read up on it now:-)
>
>>It would be as if we had put FR-CA, and ES-CO as language designation which
>>we do not do.
>
>Just as a point of clarification, I believe that en-US is a very
>common default in many FOSS distros or software packages, so I think
>that in this case there might be some justification based on
>consistency. Personally, 'International-EN' sounds like a fine choice.
If I recall it right, MS had used "international english" years ago (back in the 1990ies? early
2000s?). As I am not a native speaker of any English I cannot comment on what "international
english" is, However, I would prefer if such a term could be introduced to get emotions out of
discussion.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.