Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [WIKI] WYSIWYG editor

Hi,

2012/10/5 Charles-H. Schulz <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>:
> I have to second Marc here, except for his comment on Silverstripe. I
> realize a few people are used to the Mediawiki syntax (the languae and
> formatting used without the WYSIWYG editor) but if we take it out we
> will expect serious drops in productivity and contribution.
>
> I would suggest we look at alternatives for a wiki platform.
I don't think so.

The wiki is not intended to provide information to the wide public,
but as a working tool and pinboard for the contributors inside the
community.
Many of them are able to use the wiki-syntax which is not that hard to
learn and well documented around the web.
So I do not think a WYSIWYG is mandantory for it. (We have seen some
really bad editings with the old one....)

Silverstripe on the other hand is equipped with a WYSIWYG-editor and I
think this is very helpful there to attract people to work on the
content.

Volker


-- 
Volker Merschmann
Member of The Document Foundation
http://www.documentfoundation.org

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted