On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 16:53 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 6/19/11 4:38 PM, drew wrote:
With a 'link to' as proposed by Andrea and a minor edit by me, are there any further editing
suggestions?
I am fine with the text.
Well, you were totally correct, IMO, on catching the word permissive as
being a problem BTW.
Reading it I can't help but feel it's a bit wordy here and there.
Looking at the way I worded 'adding and removing' in the second
paragraph seems a bit awkward.
Anyway - Andreas request was for a first draft and as that, a first
draft, I think this is pretty good - not to mention others likely will
come along (or back) and make it better.
So let's call it good and hit the golf course, huh? :-)
//drew
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.